March 12, 2019

Trump Wants $100M in Fees from the Vape Industry

The Trump administration’s proposed federal budget for fiscal year 2020 includes user fees on vaping manufacturers. The fees, previously assessed only on tobacco companies, pay for the operations of the FDA Center for Tobacco Products (CTP), including regulatory and enforcement activities, and public education like the $60 million Real Cost campaign.

Tobacco user fees have never before been applied to products that don’t contain actual leaf tobacco. Currently the FDA assesses and collects user fees from manufacturers and importers of cigarettes, snuff, chewing tobacco, cigars, roll-your-own tobacco, and pipe tobacco.

“The new resources will support the FDA in its continued efforts to create a modern regulatory framework for the appropriate oversight of e-cigarettes and in taking continued steps to reduce youth use of all tobacco products,” said FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb. “One of our most important public health efforts is to continue standing up a framework to make sure we can put e-cigarettes through an appropriate series of regulatory gates, and aggressively confront youth use of these products to make sure children don’t become addicted to nicotine.”

The 2019 CTP user fee assessments total $712 million. Of that, $616 million comes from cigarette assessments.The 2020 fiscal year for the federal government begins Oct. 1, 2019.

The Trump proposal would increase the user fee cap by $100 million to a total of $812 million in fiscal year 2020, and would index future “tobacco-related product” user fee assessments to inflation. The $100 million is expected to come from the vapor industry.

“This proposal would ensure that FDA has the resources to address today’s alarming rise in youth e-cigarette use as well as new public health threats of tomorrow,” claims the White House. “New tobacco or nicotine products that are regulated by FDA should also pay a user fee, just as other tobacco related products that are subject to FDA’s user fee.”

New Hampshire Democratic Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, who recently introduced a Senate bill to assess user fees on vaping products, was positive about the proposal. Shaheen’s bill calls for assessing fees of $150 million, or two percent of vape sales during the previous (2019) fiscal year. “I hope to work with the administration as I rally bipartisan support for my legislation in Congress,” Shaheen told the Washington Post.

The administration is proposing a total FDA budget of $6.1 billion. Of that, $2.8 billion is from user fees — about $2 billion from drug and medical device companies, and most of the rest from tobacco (and vape) manufacturers. The 2020 FDA budget, if approved by Congress, would include about a seven percent increase in funding over the 2019 budget. The budget including the new user fees must be approved by Congress

No one from the White House has explained how imposing user fees on non-tobacco nicotine products fits with President Trump’s stated mission to reduce regulations and lower taxes. It is also unclear why the administration expects the vaping industry to contribute one-eighth of the CTP’s total budget, when vapes represent a much smaller portion of the entire tobacco products market. How was the $100 million figure arrived at? No one knows.

Currently, tobacco user fees are calculated using a complex formula that includes a multiple of the federal excise tax rate for each type of tobacco product. It isn’t known whether the Trump administration’s proposal means that a federal tax on vapor products will also be imposed, or if a new system will be used to assess user fees for e-cigarettes. Either would require amending the Tobacco Control Act.

User fees are not technically taxes, and are not charged directly to consumers. But as with any cost to manufacturers, the user fees have to be passed onto buyers or taken from profits. Manufacturers and importers will raise the prices vapers pay to offset the user fees. Higher prices mean fewer smokers will switch to vaping.

Reactions from the vaping industry and from conservative activists were swift and negative.

“President Trump should fire whoever duped his office into proposing this $100 million tax increase on adult consumers trying to quit smoking,” said American Vaping Association president Gregory Conley. “This is nothing more than a virtue tax that will cost jobs and lives.

“Most absurdly, the proposal says nothing about how each manufacturer’s share of the fee is to be calculated,” Conley added. “Cigarette and smokeless tobacco user fees are determined by breaking down the share of federal excise taxes paid by each company in those industries. What exactly is the FDA’s grand plan to determine how much an e-liquid manufacturer is required to pay yearly?”

“It’s unfortunate, however, that a proposed tax increase championed by Gottlieb has made its way into the President’s budget,” said Paul Blair of Americans for Tax Reform. “We’re hopeful that Congress rejects this misguided assault on the life-saving potential of e-cigarettes and that the Senate replaces Gottlieb with someone who champions the cause of consumer freedom, innovation, and tobacco harm reduction.”

Smokers created vaping without any help from the tobacco industry or anti-smoking crusaders, and vapers have the right to keep innovating to help themselves. My goal is to provide clear, honest information about the challenges vaping faces from lawmakers, regulators, and brokers of disinformation. I recently joined the CASAA board, but my opinions aren’t necessarily CASAA’s, and vice versa. You can find me on Twitter @whycherrywhy

Add comment

E-mail is already registered on the site. Please use the Login form or enter another.

You entered an incorrect username or password

Sorry that something went wrong, repeat again!

5comments

by Newest
by Best by Newest by Oldest
1

Grimm Green is exactly what Im thinking. Disappointing. Adding to the swamp, not cleaning it up. 100 million going where? To FDA to “address today’s alarming rise in youth e-cigarette use as well as new public health threats of tomorrow”. 100 million for some vague reasons and no actual plan on why they need $100 mil. It’s outrageous. Its criminal. I want 100 mil for , something, now not going to tell you and because of the future, who knows when we’ll need your money for vague excuses in the future, so let’s just get it over with now so I dont have to steal more for another year.

Jim McDonald
Author2

Tobacco user fees are how the Center for Tobacco Products is funded. It’s in the Tobacco Control Act (which is part of the Food, Drug and Cossmetic Act — the FDA’s controlling legislation), and since the agency has deemed vapes to be tobacco products, they think it’s fair that vape companies pay too.

I’m not defending that, or disagreeing that it’s wrong. But that’s the (pretty straightforward) explanation.

3

And they suddenly need 100 million dollars more for current and future health crises? Please. You really buy that? They just can get away with it because nobody sticks up for smokers because it’s a vice that’s fallen out of favor with many people so you can be picked on by the government.

Jim McDonald
Author4

No, I don’t buy that FDA should regulate vaping products at all. But since they do, and since they’ve written vapes into the Tobacco Control Act, the imposition of user fees isn’t too surprising a result.

5

That’s still a disgusting money grab hurting other people. But you’re right.

Best Beginner Vapes in 2019
LEARN MORE
Vaping360
FOLLOW US
© Vaping360, All Rights Reserved.