62 million smokers and vaping enthusiasts reached since 2015!
August 24, 2021

Canada: Flavor Ban Comments Due by September 2nd

Update Aug. 24, 2021

Canadian vapers and other interested parties have until Sept. 2 to make comments on Health Canada's proposed flavor ban.

There will be no further consultations or debate on the issue. For vapers, this is the final opportunity to weigh in on a ban that is likely to shut down most vape shops and make the most attractive products unavailable. If the proposed flavor rules take effect, it's unlikely they'll be changed except by amending the law that gives Health Canada regulatory authority over vaping, which would be a difficult process that would probably take years, if it's possible at all.

Instructions for commenting can be found in the last section of this article.

June 21, 2021

The Canadian government has initiated the process of banning most flavored vaping products. The flavor ban will be implemented as a regulation by Health Canada, and will prohibit flavors other than tobacco, menthol and mint.

Health Canada will also finalize a rule, proposed last December, to cap the nicotine strength of e-liquid and DIY nicotine at 20 mg/mL (or two percent). Despite opposition from vapers during the public comment period, the nicotine cap rule was completed in the promised six-month timeframe. It will be published on June 23 and take effect on July 8. Retailers will have until July 23 to clear existing stock.

The draft flavor regulations were published Saturday in the Canada Gazette, serving notice that they too will be adopted in six months (technically 180 days)—sometime in January 2022.

The agency is proposing not just a ban on flavor descriptors or “characterizing” flavors—as most flavor restrictions do—but setting out a list of allowable ingredients used to create tobacco, menthol and mint e-liquid flavorings. The agency will impose complete prohibition of all other flavorings, including all sweeteners used in e-liquid. Health Canada estimates that 80-85 percent of existing tobacco and menthol/mint e-liquids will have to be reformulated.

The rules will “prescribe sensory attributes standards to prevent a sensory perception other than one that is typical of tobacco or mint/menthol.” In other words, there will be no sneaking vanilla or caramel into the tobacco flavors, or berries into the menthol.

When Canada amended its Tobacco Act in 2018 to become the Tobacco and Vaping Products Act, Parliament gave Health Canada the ability to create product standards, such as limiting nicotine content or available flavors. Health Canada has also mandated child-resistant refillable tanks and imposed advertising restrictions.

Why is Health Canada banning vape flavors?

The flavor ban is being presented as a tactic to reduce youth vaping, without any evidence to indicate that it can accomplish that goal. Health Canada says the currently available flavor variety is “believed to have contributed to the rise in youth vaping.” Prohibiting flavors, according to the agency, is “expected to contribute to making these products less appealing to youth, which would help address the rapid rise in youth vaping.”

But most teenagers who vape are not committed to vaping. Rather, they’re occasional experimenters for whom curiosity, not flavor options, is the driving factor. If they can’t get the flavor they prefer (if they prefer one at all), they will use a different flavor—or experiment with cigarettes instead, as a recent Yale study showed.

Conversely, flavors are crucial for exclusive vapers—regular users who no longer smoke. Surveys of vapers show that fruit and dessert flavors are by far the most popular, especially among users who have quit smoking entirely.

Two 2018 studies of American vapers’ flavor preferences—one led by Christopher Russell, and one by Konstantinos Farsalinos—showed that four times as many adult vapers favored fruit or dessert flavors over tobacco flavors. More than three times as many preferred candy flavors to tobacco. Health Canada even admits the importance of flavors to this group.

“Measures to limit flavours in vaping products to reduce their appeal to youth may also make these products less attractive to people who either vape as an alternative to cigarettes or to stay abstinent from smoking,” says the proposed rule. “Adults who successfully quit smoking with vaping products often cite flavours as important in breaking the link with smoking. Fruit flavours are the preferred choice for adults and youth….A recent study conducted in both Canada and the United States shows that a variety of non-tobacco flavours, especially fruit, are popular among adults who vape, particularly among those who have quit smoking and are now exclusively vaping.”

The explosion of non-tobacco vape flavors in the early part of the last decade was the result of vapers seeking more effective products to help them avoid cigarettes. Flavors were a user innovation, as University of Waterloo (Ontario) PhD candidate Amelia Howard explained in 2019.

“Flavors reflect the preferences of the people who use these products to stop smoking,” wrote Howard. “E-cigarettes don’t work when people don’t like them, and flavors are what the people who need e-cigarettes like about them.”

“Health Canada acknowledges that cigarette smoking kills 48,000 Canadians a year and that vaping is far less hazardous,” University of Ottawa law professor and tobacco control expert David Sweanor said. “But then actively engages in measures that will kill the legal vaping market and thus many more Canadians who will continue smoking. It is time to reject abstinence-only agendas and embrace basic public health principles.”

Health Canada understands that flavors are important to the people who have broken their dependence on cigarettes. The agency even admits it has no idea what former smokers who now vape will do when flavors are removed from the market, noting that “it is unknown what the impact would be on people who vape if they had no access to their preferred vaping product flavour.”

It is known in Nova Scotia. That Canadian province banned flavored vapes in early 2020. Six months later, retailers reported a 21 percent increase in cigarette sales. A poll in the province showed that 29 percent of vapers were at risk for relapsing to cigarettes.

But Health Canada is willing to gamble with former smokers’ lives—for the kids, of course. The agency admits that reducing the variety of vape flavors will lead some vapers back to smoking and prevent some smokers from switching. But the regulators don’t seem to care that much.

Buried deep in the cost analysis of the proposal is an acknowledgement that some people who smoke will continue, rather than switching to the less-attractive flavors that will be allowed. But, says Health Canada, the good news is that tobacco companies will sell cigarettes to those people, “hence offsetting the loss of sales of tobacco- and mint/menthol-flavoured vaping products.”

Will vape shops survive without flavored products?

Vape shops and online retailers will not survive a flavor ban—especially in combination with the nicotine limit that takes effect in July. While closed-system pod-based products—probably souped up to deliver more vapor from the mandated lower-nicotine content—will remain popular, vape shops need a wide variety of e-liquid flavors to prosper. No one is making a special trip to a vape shop to choose between 20 tobacco, menthol and mint e-liquids.

Some may convert to black market operations, selling illegal liquids without fanfare. Others will probably join their cousins in American states with flavor bans, trying various hybrid business models to get by. Many will simply close.

The rule allows manufacture of flavored products for export. Some large Canadian e-liquid producers may have enough foreign business to successfully limit their domestic business to the allowed flavors. Juul Labs and the tobacco companies will carry on with tobacco, menthol and mint. Mint is a popular JUUL flavor anyway.

Health Canada will accept comments on the proposed rule, although the primary public consultation on vaping regulations was published and completed in 2019. Of the 24,000 comments received in response to questions about potential vaping rules, 23,000 were preprinted postcards organized by vape shops, which were largely ignored by the regulators. Few vapers took the time to compose serious comments.

Comments to Health Canada are due by Sept. 2

Comments to Health Canada must be received by Sept. 2. There will be no further opportunities to object to these rules.

The Vaping Industry Trade Association of Canada (VITA) has created a website that offers vapers two options for responding to Health Canada: sending their own comments, or sending a letter crafted by the trade group. Vape shop owner Thomas Kirsop strongly advises consumers to send a personal response, including the story about how vaping flavored products helped you.

By personalizing the response, Health Canada reviewers are forced to count each response individually, rather than lumping them as “one unique response.” They’re also reminded with each story that their regulations will hurt real people.

You can also respond directly to Health Canada by mail or email:

Tobacco Products Regulatory Office
Tobacco Control Directorate
Controlled Substances and Cannabis Branch
Health Canada
150 Tunney’s Pasture Driveway
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0K9

Or email: [email protected]

Smokers created vaping without any help from the tobacco industry or anti-smoking crusaders, and vapers have the right to keep innovating to help themselves. My goal is to provide clear, honest information about the challenges vaping faces from lawmakers, regulators, and brokers of disinformation. I recently joined the CASAA board, but my opinions aren’t necessarily CASAA’s, and vice versa. You can find me on Twitter @whycherrywhy
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
29 Comments
most voted
newest oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Stu
Stu
5 months ago

Can you imagine what would happen if they tried to do the same with Alcohol.
You get one flavor of beer, one wine and one spirit and the government gets to decide what ingredients are used to make it.

Coolers would be banned because it encourages under age drinking.

The idea seems so ridiculous yet that is exactly what they are doing with vaping

Shane
Shane
22 days ago
Reply to  Stu

Flavored alcohol doesn’t hurt the bottom line of the tobacco companies, so they have no problems with that.

Tom
Tom
2 months ago
Reply to  Stu

I agree totally. Have plain flavored beers, plain flavored hard liquor, plain flavored wines and ban all other alcohol flavored types. Have all alcohol, especially hard liquor, taste like rot gut hand sanitizer. If drinkers don’t like it, too bad so sad, have Health Canada turn their noses up at them like what they are doing to Vapers. But no. Let’s ban Vaping flavors instead. Yet flavored alcohol, especially flavored liquor is allowed to remain untouched.. Only Vaping flavors get targeted – with the excuse of “the kids”, which is an excuse that I, quite frankly, am sick of hearing.… Read more »

Last edited 2 months ago by Tom
Mr_Insomniac420
Mr_Insomniac420
5 months ago

Let’s ban the flavors and give the tobacco companies there long waited paycheck.

Ethan
Ethan
3 months ago

They should just find better ways to ensure that vape products aren’t obtainable to youth. Shouldn’t make ppl suffer because kids wanna be dumb.

Mike
Mike
1 month ago
Reply to  Ethan

They ID at vape shops just like at the liquor store and dispensaries and to buy smokes at a gas station,
Kids still get ahold of that stuff too
It’s not our job as vapers to watch people’s children stop being lazy parents (you know who you are) and watch your kids,
Same person who complains probably has a bunch of flavored liquor in their fridge that their kids get into 😂

Nancy Corupe
Nancy Corupe
3 months ago

It was alluded to in this post about the likely possibity of flavoured e-juices to go underground (black market). This effectively takes the power away from the regulators and therefore poses the potential for dangerous substances to be used and accessibility for the very people they are claiming to protect. This makes no logical sense to me. I believe the future will not look favorably on this war against vaping.

Last edited 3 months ago by Nancy Corupe
Tom
Tom
2 months ago
Reply to  Nancy Corupe

The war needs to be against smoking – not vaping. This flavor ban is clearly an abuse of power that will be taken too far. So let’s ban all flavors in vaping but let’s allow all flavors to remain and be sold in alcohol. NO. That is not only unacceptable, that is clearly insane. But hey, if Vapers go back to smoking and get Cancer, they can always sue Health Canada for a variety of reasons. Rights are being stepped on here. And it’s time to tell the government to mind their own business through lawsuits and protests. Enough is… Read more »

Last edited 2 months ago by Tom
Joseph
Joseph
5 months ago

I’m still baffled how they are turning what is an obvious blacklist into a magic whitelist. It literally says “list prohibited ingredients by name or composition” and they are like “LOL all but these.”

Best Beginner Vapes in 2021
LEARN MORE
Vaping360
FOLLOW US
© Vaping360, All Rights Reserved.