November 15, 2018

FDA Will Ban Most Vape Flavors Except in Adult-Only Stores

FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb announced his plan to reduce youth vaping, and it turned out to be rather anticlimactic. After months of build-up, the FDA chief’s statement was only particularly surprising for its attention to combustible products — which of course is where the FDA’s focus should be.

Vape advocates will be unhappy with Gottlieb’s plan to restrict flavors (other than tobacco, menthol and mint) to adult-only locations. And anti-vaping activists will be disappointed to hear that the commissioner didn’t announce an immediate flavor ban. He did remind everyone that rulemaking on flavors is in progress. The FDA could still issue rules that would disrupt or kill the independent vaping market.

But Gottlieb didn’t announce any news on vaping rules that were unexpected. Most of his plans echo the announcement made by JUUL Labs two days ago. As Gottlieb promised, the FDA is putting “speed bumps” in the road for adult smokers seeking alternatives to cigarettes.

He also didn’t issue firm dates for any of his proposals.

The biggest news the commissioner made was that he will seek bans on menthol cigarettes and flavored cigars. Those initiatives may somewhat mollify the tobacco control groups that were hoping for big news on vaping restrictions. But nothing would really make those people happy — at least nothing short of announcing public executions of top JUUL executives.

Gottlieb says the 2018 National Youth Tobacco Survey data that he’s been using to whip up the teen vaping media frenzy will be released later today. According to the commissioner, it shows that 27.7 percent of current high school vapers are using e-cigarettes on 20 or more days of the month. That’s a tricky way of presenting the data though, and it may mean less than he implies.

Here are Commissioner Gottlieb’s specific policy suggestions and recommendations:

  • Flavored vaping products (except tobacco, menthol and mint) will only be sold in age-restricted retail stores. (So vape shops that prevent minors from entering would be able, for now, to sell e-liquid in a variety of flavors)
  • FDA will continue to monitor youth use of menthol and (especially) mint flavored vape products, and may reconsider its policies if necessary
  • FDA will curtail online sales of flavored products from sites that do not implement “heightened” age verification processes. FDA will issue a set of best practices for online retailers soon
  • FDA will “pursue the removal” of of vaping products that are “marketed to children and/or appealing to youth. “This could include using popular children’s cartoon or animated characters, or names of products favored by kids like brands of candy or soda”
  • FDA will propose a product standard that will ban flavors in all cigars, and eliminate the extended compliance date for newly deemed cigars
  • FDA will proceed with its plan to issue standards for flavors in all tobacco products (including vapor products)
  • FDA will seek to make rules banning menthol from combustible tobacco products

The big story is the proposed ban on menthol cigarettes. The FDA has attempted to do this before without success. Any such action will be legally challenged by the cigarette industry, particularly British American Tobacco, which less than two years ago bought RJ Reynolds primarily to acquire the popular Newport brand.

There are hidden losers here too. NJOY, which sells flavored e-cigarettes and pod devices mainly in convenience stores and pharmacies, will be punished by the ban as much or more than JUUL. NJOY has never been accused of marketing to or targeting teenagers, and it doesn’t have a big footprint in vape shops to count on.

Gottlieb didn’t offer anything new about standards for submitting premarket tobacco applications. While the clock keeps ticking toward the 2022 deadline for submitting PMTA’s for vapor products, the commissioner didn’t have anything to offer desperate e-liquid manufacturers except the long-repeated promise that “additional policies and procedures” would be coming sometime in the “coming months.”

For people who’ve spent the last decade living under the FDA guillotine, kicking that can down the road one more time feels a lot like offering “thoughts and prayers” to the victims of a senseless crime that should have been prevented. The independent vaping industry needs to know if it will be allowed to have a future.

Smokers created vaping without any help from the tobacco industry or anti-smoking crusaders, and vapers have the right to keep innovating to help themselves. My goal is to provide clear, honest information about the challenges vaping faces from lawmakers, regulators, and brokers of disinformation. I recently joined the CASAA board, but my opinions aren’t necessarily CASAA’s, and vice versa. You can find me on Twitter @whycherrywhy

Add comment

E-mail is already registered on the site. Please use the Login form or enter another.

You entered an incorrect username or password

Sorry that something went wrong, repeat again!

8comments

by Newest
by Best by Newest by Oldest
1

Complete waste of time and resources. All they’ve done is make it more appealing thus extending the fad time line. Teens vape because they are told not to.

Jim McDonald
Author2

I’m sure that’s true for many. I’m also sure some of them like nicotine, just as I did.

3

2022 is the PMTA date we have now, but a win from the other party in 2020 could put Mr. Gottlieb out of work, speed up the process, or worse.

In addition, we have major cities and counties in CA, NY, and a few others somewhere in the process of banning flavors, raising age limits, and adding taxes.

Hopefully CASAA and others will keep up with the long battle it has been. I certainly appreciate their life and business saving work.

Jim McDonald
Author4

A Democratic win *will* put him out of work — and for that matter, he might not make it that long. Anything can happen. Vaping businesses should be spending money on lobbying. Unfortunately, a small percentage do. And vapers should donate to CASAA, which is the only organization that is dedicated to representing consumers. [Full disclosure: I am on the CASAA board.]

5

I guess i know which party im voting for then next election 🙂 These people really need to think about the impact cigarettes has had on health and the Great impact Vaping has had helping millions and millions of people quit cigarettes. Like i have said before i just feel stupid for not trying out vaping sooner would have saved my throat and lungs alot from those icky sticks honestly stopping cigarettes with the help of vaping is the best thing i have done for my health.

Jim McDonald
Author6

I don’t think Republicans are reliable for saving the vaping industry, and I’m *sure* the Democrats aren’t. My best advice is to talk to whichever politicians you like better and try to influence them. We need to teach ALL of them in every party that vaping isn’t the tobacco industry, but even more importantly that vapers are people who need their help. We’re their constituents, and they should pay attention to what we want.

7

Both parties are responsible for stomping on people’s freedoms in order to protect children (instead of actually parenting the children). It’s not like any of these politicians have to obey any of the laws they create. The vaping industry needs to invest in some serious lobbying in order to keep their industry alive. Currently, they seem to be letting the tobacco industry speak on their behalf (which we all know is bad). I just hope they see the writing on the wall before it is too late.

Jim McDonald
Author8

I think that, even more important than hiring more lobbyists, at this point they need to be putting money into major public education campaigns. Public opinion is the only thing that will make politicians change their minds.

Best Pod & Mini Vapes of 2018
LEARN MORE