Advertisement
Advertise with us
sidenav

Vape Company Lawsuit Charges FDA Fines Are Unconstitutional

Advertisement
Advertise with us

A California-based online vape retailer has filed a lawsuit challenging the FDA Center for Tobacco Products’ right to impose so-called Civil Money Penalties (fines) through administrative proceedings. 

The retailer, Huff and Puffers LLC of Garden Grove, says the fines allowed under provisions of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (of which the Tobacco Control Act is a part) are unconstitutional because they violate the company’s right to a jury trial. The company also charges that the FDA has engaged in selective enforcement, since no Big Tobacco company has received a Civil Money Penalty, despite selling vaping products without an FDA Marketing Granted Order (MGO).

The FDA notified Huff and Puffers in June that the agency would seek a Civil Money Penalty of $20,678 for selling vape products not authorized for sale by the FDA. 

The lawsuit, filed on Sept. 27 in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, cites the recent Supreme Court decision in SEC v. Jarkesy that found another federal administrative agency (the Securities and Exchange Commission) violated the Seventh Amendment to the Constitution by imposing punitive administrative fines without allowing a jury trial.

The court said that since the SEC’s civil fines are punitive in nature, rather than compensatory—the agency “is not obligated to return any money to victims”—that they “are designed to punish and deter,” and therefore can only be imposed after a jury trial.

Commentary on the case in SCOTUSblog noted that the Jarkesy decision “will have a far-reaching impact on dozens of federal administrative agencies that use similar processes”—like the FDA with its Civil Money Penalties.

Civil Money Penalties are imposed by administrative law judges in the Civil Remedies Division of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Departmental Appeals Board. They are appealed through the same board, and only if the internal appeal is denied may the fined party seek review by a federal appeals court.

Lawyers for Huff and Puffers say in the lawsuit that the FDA process forces the company “to incur the time and expense of an unconstitutional proceeding.” 

Indeed, the expense of challenging the administrative fines probably dissuades most companies from fighting the action. The cost of appealing a fine internally and then again in federal court might be considerably more expensive than simply paying the fine.

The FDA has sought Civil Money Penalties against multiple vape product sellers, mostly for selling unauthorized disposable vapes. According to the agency, companies can pay the penalty, enter into a settlement agreement, request an extension to file an answer, or file an answer and request a hearing.

Advertisement
Advertise with us
Latest Reviews
Article preview image
Freemax REXA PRO & REXA SMART Review: Too Smart?

The Freemax REXA PRO and REXA SMART are highly advanced pod vapes, offering seemingly endless features, beautiful touchscreens, and new DUOMAX pods.

Wed Jul 30 2025
Article preview image
OXVA XLIM Pro 2 DNA Review: A Match Made in Heaven!

The OXVA XLIM Pro 2 DNA is powered by a custom-made Evolv DNA chipset, offering a Replay function and dry hit protection. Read our review to find out more.

Fri Jul 18 2025
Article preview image
SKE Bar Review: A Reusable Crystal Bar!

The SKE Bar is a 2 mL replaceable pod vape with a 500 mAh battery, a 1.2-ohm mesh coil, and 35 flavors to choose from in 2% nicotine.

Mon Jul 7 2025
Advertisement
Advertise with us
Latest Learn
vaping taxes
Vaping Taxes in the United States and Around the World

Because of declining cigarette sales, state governments in the U.S. and countries around the world are looking to vapor products as a new source of tax revenue.

Thu Jul 31 2025
How Old Do You Have to Be to Vape?
How Old Do You Have to Be to Vape?

The legal age to buy e-cigarettes and other vaping products varies around the world. The United States recently changed the legal minimum sales age to 21.

Tue Jul 1 2025
Where vaping is banned or restricted
Vape Bans: E-Cigarette Restrictions in the U.S. and Worldwide

A list of vaping product flavor bans and online sales bans in the United States, and sales and possession bans in other countries.

Fri Jul 4 2025
About Authors
Jim McDonald
845 posts

Smokers created vaping for themselves without help from the tobacco industry or anti-tobacco crusaders, and I believe vapers and the vaping industry have the right to continue innovating to give everyone who wants to use nicotine access to safe and attractive non-combustible options. My goal is to provide clear, honest information about vaping and the challenges nicotine consumers face from lawmakers, regulators, and brokers of disinformation. You can find me on Twitter @whycherrywhy

See author’s profile
Vaping360.com strives to be the world's most trusted resource for vapers and smokers. We take pride in our editorial integrity, accuracy, and the honesty of our writers.
Read more about us

Rely on Our Expertise

At Vaping360, we take pride in our deep expertise and years of experience in the vaping industry. Our dedicated team of professionals is committed to leveraging their extensive knowledge to meet your needs and exceed your expectations.

Authenticity

Genuine insights backed by thorough and exhaustive research and testing.

Reliability

Consistent, accurate information from the vaping industry experts.

Empowerment

Transparent and reliable content for confident and informed decision-making.

About us

Our mission is clear: to help people who smoke transition to low-risk alternatives and contribute to a smoke-free world. With each article we publish and each review we conduct, we're working towards this goal.

about-us-banner
product preview