Advertisement
Advertise with us
sidenav

Appeals Court Tosses Oregon's Bizarre Vape Packaging Restrictions

Advertisement
Advertise with us

The Oregon Court of Appeals has ruled that the state law restricting the words and images used on vape product packaging, and the administrative rules that detail the restrictions, violate the free speech guarantees of the state constitution. The decision, handed down yesterday, reverses a lower-court ruling that upheld the state restrictions. 

The appeals court sided with Division Vapor owner Paul Bates, who filed the lawsuit challenging the state restrictions in 2018. The lawsuit, which named the Oregon Health Authority as defendant, was originally filed in the Oregon State Circuit Court in Multnomah County.

The law, passed in 2017, prohibits vape businesses from selling vaping products “in a manner that is attractive to minors,” and gave the Oregon Health Authority (OHA) power to create specific regulations, which the agency did. The resulting Oregon vape packaging rules took effect Sept. 1, 2018.

“An inhalant delivery system is packaged in a manner that is attractive to minors if because of the packaging’s presentation, shape, graphics, coloring or writing, it is likely to appeal to minors,” wrote the OHA in rule OAR 333-015-0357. “The Authority considers the following nonexclusive list to be likely to appeal to minors: Cartoons; Celebrities, athletes, mascots, fictitious characters played by people, or other people likely to appeal to minors; Food or beverages likely to appeal to minors such as candy, desserts, soda, food or beverages with sweet flavors including fruit or alcohol; Terms or descriptive words for flavors that are likely to appeal to minors such as tart, tangy, sweet, cool, fire, ice, lit, spiked, poppin’, juicy, candy, desserts, soda, sweet flavors including fruit, or alcohol flavors; or The shape of any animal, commercially recognizable toy, sports equipment, or commercially recognizable candy.”

Under the Oregon rules, a strawberry-flavored vape juice, for example, could not use the word “strawberry” or a picture of a strawberry on its label. If the strawberry flavor is tart, the label could not reflect that—even though sales to anyone under age 21 is illegal, and Division Vapor doesn’t allow anyone under 21 to enter the stores.

The appeals court decision invalidates those rules, unless the state appeals to the Oregon Supreme Court and wins. According to The Oregonian, the OHA has not decided yet whether it will appeal.

 

Image courtesy Stray Fox Photography.

Advertisement
Advertise with us
Latest Reviews
Article preview image
Freemax REXA PRO & REXA SMART Review: Too Smart?

The Freemax REXA PRO and REXA SMART are highly advanced pod vapes, offering seemingly endless features, beautiful touchscreens, and new DUOMAX pods.

Wed Jul 30 2025
Article preview image
OXVA XLIM Pro 2 DNA Review: A Match Made in Heaven!

The OXVA XLIM Pro 2 DNA is powered by a custom-made Evolv DNA chipset, offering a Replay function and dry hit protection. Read our review to find out more.

Fri Jul 18 2025
Article preview image
SKE Bar Review: A Reusable Crystal Bar!

The SKE Bar is a 2 mL replaceable pod vape with a 500 mAh battery, a 1.2-ohm mesh coil, and 35 flavors to choose from in 2% nicotine.

Mon Jul 7 2025
Advertisement
Advertise with us
Latest Learn
vaping taxes
Vaping Taxes in the United States and Around the World

Because of declining cigarette sales, state governments in the U.S. and countries around the world are looking to vapor products as a new source of tax revenue.

Thu Jul 31 2025
How Old Do You Have to Be to Vape?
How Old Do You Have to Be to Vape?

The legal age to buy e-cigarettes and other vaping products varies around the world. The United States recently changed the legal minimum sales age to 21.

Tue Jul 1 2025
Where vaping is banned or restricted
Vape Bans: E-Cigarette Restrictions in the U.S. and Worldwide

A list of vaping product flavor bans and online sales bans in the United States, and sales and possession bans in other countries.

Fri Jul 4 2025
About Authors
Jim McDonald
845 posts

Smokers created vaping for themselves without help from the tobacco industry or anti-tobacco crusaders, and I believe vapers and the vaping industry have the right to continue innovating to give everyone who wants to use nicotine access to safe and attractive non-combustible options. My goal is to provide clear, honest information about vaping and the challenges nicotine consumers face from lawmakers, regulators, and brokers of disinformation. You can find me on Twitter @whycherrywhy

See author’s profile
Vaping360.com strives to be the world's most trusted resource for vapers and smokers. We take pride in our editorial integrity, accuracy, and the honesty of our writers.
Read more about us

Rely on Our Expertise

At Vaping360, we take pride in our deep expertise and years of experience in the vaping industry. Our dedicated team of professionals is committed to leveraging their extensive knowledge to meet your needs and exceed your expectations.

Authenticity

Genuine insights backed by thorough and exhaustive research and testing.

Reliability

Consistent, accurate information from the vaping industry experts.

Empowerment

Transparent and reliable content for confident and informed decision-making.

About us

Our mission is clear: to help people who smoke transition to low-risk alternatives and contribute to a smoke-free world. With each article we publish and each review we conduct, we're working towards this goal.

about-us-banner
product preview